The main goal of the method is to achieve consensus

The Delphi method assumes that people speak individually and anonymously. Unlike, for example, the brainstorming method , where everything is decid through discussion, all participants are known and build on each other’s ideas and statements. Colleagues from the same company and invit specialists can participate. Step-by-step The Delphi method allows you to thoroughly examine the problem and draw objective conclusions due to the fact that the method procure takes place in several stages and rounds. Each subsequent round depends on the answers and assessments of the experts and is bas on the results of the previous one.

Correspondence course Surveys using

This method can be conduct remotely and involve portugal phone number library specialists from different cities or countries. Delphi Method Stages The Delphi method consists of several successive stages: preparatory, main and analytical. Preparatory stage Two groups are form: expert – a group consisting of experts who have competencies and relevant experience in the field; organizational – a group that will collect and analyze the experts’ responses.

Main stage At this stage, expert opinions

Are collect in several rounds. First round The organizing group formulates the problem and conducts a survey of experts on general issues. Bas on people’s opinions, analysts create an even more specific questionnaire. Also, in the first round, analysts can ask experts to break the general topic down into subtopics themselves and create the next questionnaire bas on this data. Second round The analysis group starts collecting the experts’ opinions again.

After each round, the organizers analyze

The answers and present the conclusions to the experts. After creative email strategies to ruce abandon cart rates receiving the results, they can change their initial opinions, taking into account the arguments of other experts. Third round There may be more than three rounds. among experts to develop general recommendations. Analysts summarize ws data opinions. If points of view constantly diverge and consensus cannot be reach, then perhaps mistakes. Were made in the previous steps or key aspects of the problem were not taken into account. Analysts may suggest going back to the problem definition stage.